Lifting the blame from the Imaams series part 10 – Ibn Juraij

Raful al-Laa’imah Aanil Ai’mah Series- Part 10

In Defence of The Imaam, The Faqeeh,

Abdul Maalik ibn al-Juraij

(Rahimahullah)

By

Shaikh Irshad ul-Haqq Atharee (Haafidhahullah)

 Series compilers and Trans: Abu Hibbaan & Abu Khuzaimah Ansaari

The hanafee’s say Imaam Ibn Juraij was a shee’ah and he performed mu’ta with 90 women.

Shaikh Irshaad ul-Haqq said

He was Abdul Maalik and he was counted from amongst the jurists of Makkah. He is trustworthy with agreement although he was a mudallis,

Haafidh Ibn Hajr said, “Trustworthy (thiqah), a jurist, learned and he would do tadlees and irsaal.” (Taqreeb (pg.219)

Haafidh Dhahabee said, “He was from one of the trustworthy scholars, he performed tadlees. However regarding him there is unanimous agreement (Ijmaa) on his trustworthiness.” (Meezaan (2/659)

Imaam Ibn Juraij is a well known narrator of Saheeh al-Bukhaari and Saheeh Muslim, rather of the six most authentic books of hadeeth. Pick up any book of narrators or history and in none of them has any Imaam of Ahlus-Sunnah declared Imaam Ibn Juraij to be a shee’ah. The hanafee’s only say this about Ibn Juraij on the account that he performed mu’ta with 90 women.

We say if this was the basis for which they declare Ibn Juraij to be a shea’ah then his teacher, Imaam A’taa ibn Abee Rabaah, Imaam Tawoos, Imaam Sa’eed ibn Jubair will also be declared shee’ahs because they also believed in mu’ta, the details of this can be consulted in al-Muhalla of Ibn Hazm, Fath ul-Baaree, Sharh Muslim of Nawawee and Talkhees al-Habeer.

Regarding the mu’ta of Ibn Juraij then he retracted from it just as Ibn Abbaas (Radhiallaahu Anhuma) retracted from it. Hence attributing this action to him after his retraction is proven is extreme oppression. Haafidh Ibn Hajr said,

“Imaam Abu Awaanah has narrated from Ibn Juraij in his Saheeh that he said in Basrah, “Be my witness I have retracted from mu’ta” (Talkhees al-Habeer (pg.297) and in another edition (3/160), Fath ul-Baaree (9/173).

Therefore attributing and declaring Imaam Ibn Juraij to be from the shee’ahs is oppression. Even if his retraction were not established then a number of the other successor’s (tabi’een) would also have to be attributed to shee’ism.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s